Skip Navigation

ELT Journal 1984 38(3):204-206; doi:10.1093/elt/38.3.204
© 1984 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edge, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

Feedback with face

Julian Edge

When using peer micro-teaching as a training technique with experienced teachers, the feedback stage is often difficult to handle, because of teacher sensitivity and a reluctance to comment. This article describes a procedure used in in-service training in Turkey, which encouraged feedback dicussion that did not make individual teachers feel threatened. Individual ‘micro-tasks’ were initially discussed in small groups. At a later stage, teachers gave their own comments on their micro-teaching tasks and on the small-group dicussions. Plenary discussion and comment from the lecturer made up the final stage. This concentrated on areas of teaching, rather than individual performances.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.