Skip Navigation

ELT Journal 1985 39(1):20-27; doi:10.1093/elt/39.1.20
© 1985 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aslanian, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Investigating the reading problems of ESL students: an alternative

Yeghia Aslanian

This article reports on a study involving three high/intermediate ESL students. It is argued that since reading comprehension depends on both reader variables and text variables, it is too complicated a phenomenon to be investigated or measured by means only of psychometric measures such as multiple-choice questions, cloze procedure, or fill-in-the-blank tasks, and that we need to add an interactional element to the procedure. In the first section a rationale is proposed for a more student-oriented way of examining the reader's comprehension level and probing into his or her strategies for doing the reading tasks or solving rhetorical problems. Then the readers' ‘retellings’ and their responses to probes based on an expository multiple-choice fill-in-the-blank passage are examined and some instructional alternatives are suggested in each case. Extracts from observer-student interviews are given.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.