Skip Navigation

ELT Journal 1987 41(4):257-267; doi:10.1093/elt/41.4.257
© 1987 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arndt, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

Six writers in search of texts: A protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing

Valerie Arndt

Valerie Arndt has taught in a wide variety of EFL/ESL situations over the last twenty years, both in England and overseas. Much of her experience abroad has been in East Asia, and most recendy she has been teaching for four years in China, where she has been specifically involved with die teaching of writing. She has recendy returned to England and completed her MA in TEFL at die University of Reading.

Following the change of focus in much recent writing research from composition to composing, a number of studies have attempted to probe the second-language writing processes of EFUESL students. However, few comparative investigations of writing processes in the first and second languages have been published to date. This article reports one such exploratory study of the composing activities of six Chinese postgraduate EFL students as they produced academic written texts in both their first (Chinese) and foreign (English) languages.

Two findings are discussed. First while the composing activities of each individual writer were found to remain consistent across languages, there was considerable variation among the writers in their approach to the task of producing written text. Second, a limited awareness of the nature of the task was a common source of difficulty in both languages: there was neither adequate awareness of the nature of written language and the demands its production makes upon the writer, nor was there sufficient exploitation of the creative nature of the activity of writing itself. Finally, some implications of these findings for the teaching of writing at this level are considered.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Family JournalHome page
D. Eckstein, R. Juarez-Torres, and A. M. Perez-Gabriel
The Language Relationship Questionnaire (LRQ): Implications for Couples
The Family Journal, October 1, 2006; 14(4): 408 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language Teaching ResearchHome page
K. S. Miller
Academic writers on-line: investigating pausing in the production of text
Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2000; 4(2): 123 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
A. CUMMING
Metalinguistic and Ideational Thinking in Second Language Composing
Written Communication, October 1, 1990; 7(4): 482 - 511.
[Abstract]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.