© 1987 by Oxford University Press
Articles |
Tests of oral performance: the need for data-based criteria
Glenn Fulcher is a lecturer in English Language at the Forum Language Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus, and is also responsible for test development. He is currendy a post-graduate student of Applied English Linguistics at the University of Birmingham.
It has become almost axiomatic for communicative testing theory that the tests should contain exercises which are based on real-life communicative situations (Morrow 1979). In essence, this makes the communicative testing enterprise an exercise in content validity. The notion of sampling real life has, however, been extensively criticized (Oiler 1979:184; Alderson 1981:57), mainly because testing has been seen as the reliable prediction of success in some behavioural performance in a non-test situation. Communicative testing theory tries to tap the performance directly, and here lies the problem.
This article investigates one aspect of this problem with regard to the assessment of the English Language Testing Service,1 and attempts to uncover what appears to be a problem in the theory on which such tests are constructedor, to put it another way, a problem in construct validity.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Powers, M. A. Schedl, S. W. Leung, and F. A. Butler Validating the revised Test of Spoken English against a criterion of communicative success Language Testing, October 1, 1999; 16(4): 399 - 425. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. North and G. Schneider Scaling descriptors for language proficiency scales Language Testing, April 1, 1998; 15(2): 217 - 262. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
