Skip Navigation

ELT Journal 1995 49(1):26-36; doi:10.1093/elt/49.1.26
© 1995 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leppänen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kalaja, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Experimenting with computer conferencing in English for Academic Purposes

Sirpa Leppänen and Paula Kalaja

researcher at the Finnish Academy. She has a PhD in English Philology from the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. Her research interests include literary linguistics, discourse stylistics, and EFL/EAP reading and writing.
acting Associate Professor in the Department of English, University of Jyväskylä. She has a PhD in Applied Linguistics from Georgetown University. Her research interests include EFL/EAP reading and writing.

This article is a report on an experiment in which the applicability of computer conferencing was tested in an L2 context. With five EAP students taking a content-area course, computer conferencing was used for two purposes: for discussions, and for introducing the students to the idea of writing as a process. In this way the students (and the tutor) could work at their leisure, free of a specific time and place. These arrangements had various interesting consequences. Compared with traditional classroom discussions, the students came to do most of the ‘talking’, taking on roles other than that of a student, and therefore using computer conferencing not just for answering the teacher's questions but for a number of other functions (such as disagreeing, challenging). Moreover, the feedback that the students got from each other in the process of writing two essays differed in quality from that given by the tutor with his red pen. This paper discusses these and other findings in greater detail, and gives suggestions for improving the system.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.