Skip Navigation

ELT Journal 1999 53(4):256-261; doi:10.1093/elt/53.4.256
© 1999 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shehadeh, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Gender differences and equal opportunities in the ESL classroom

Ali Shehadeh

Assistant Professor at the Department of English, University of Aleppo, Syria (and currently at the College of Languages and Translation, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia). He got his MA (1988) and PhD (1991) in applied linguistics with special reference to second language acquisition (SLA) and TESL/TEFL from the University of Durham, England. He has taught several under- and postgraduate courses in linguistics, applied linguistics, research methodology, and writing and composition, in Syria and Saudi Arabia. His areas of interest are SLA, teaching methodology, and the comprehension–performance relationship of L2 learners. E-mail: ashhada{at}ksu.edu.sa

There is good evidence from cross-gender conversations between the various possible combinations of native speakers (NS) and non-native speakers (NNS) to suggest that men and women tend to use conversation for different purposes. It would appear that men take advantage of the conversation in a way that allows them to promote their performance/production ability, whereas women utilize the conversation to promote their comprehension ability. The main pedagogical conclusion to be drawn from the available evidence is that the ESL/EFL teacher, equipped with a good syllabus and a good methodology, should be able to engineer situations that create equal opportunities for both males and females in all aspects of classroom interaction. However, the article also suggests that more empirical research needs to be done into (a) the origin(s) of gender difference (biological/innate, psychological, or socio-cultural), and (b) its effect on second language learning.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.