© 2002 by Oxford University Press
Options of identity in academic writing
1 The City University of Hong Kong. Email: Ken.hyland{at}cityu.edu.hk
Students often see academic writing as an alien form of literacy designed to disguise the author and deal directly with facts. Style guides and textbooks commonly portray scholarly writing as a kind of impersonal, faceless discourse, and EAP teachers direct students to remove themselves from their texts. But how realistic is this advice? In this article I briefly explore the most visible expression of a writer's presence in a text: the use of exclusive first person pronouns. I show that not all disciplines follow the same conventions of impersonality, and that in fact there is considerable scope for the negotiation of identity in academic writing. I argue that by treating academic discourse as uniformly impersonal we actually do a disservice to our students, and that as teachers, we might better assist them by raising their awareness of the options available to them as writers.
Received May 2001.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Newbold Co-certification: a new direction for external assessment? ELT J, January 1, 2009; 63(1): 51 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
