Skip Navigation

ELT Journal 2005 59(1):3-13; doi:10.1093/elt/cci001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nitta, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

ELT Journal Volume 59/1 January 2005 © Oxford University Press

Consciousness-raising and practice in ELT coursebooks

Ryo Nitta1 and Sheena Gardner2

1 Ryo Nita is a PhD student (English Language Teaching) at the University of Warwick, UK. His research interests include the relationship between form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. Email: R.Nitta{at}warwick.ac.uk, 2 Sheena Gardner lectures at the University of Warwick in educational linguistics, grammar teaching, and ESP. Her current research focuses on discourses of assessment in primary EAL and university contexts. Email: S.F.Gardner{at}warwick.ac.uk

Most general ELT coursebooks currently include grammar tasks, suggesting a common view in ELT that learners benefit from form-focused tasks to improve their L2 accuracy. To investigate the nature of such tasks, we developed a framework of consciousness-raising and practice task types, applied it to nine contemporary ELT coursebooks, and thus identified a number of current trends. Despite notable differences among the nine coursebooks, each one is essentially based on a Presentation-Practice approach to grammar teaching. Both inductive and deductive approaches are seen in the presentation stages, followed by two types of practising task. There is little evidence to date of focused communication tasks. These fi ndings are discussed, and should be useful for teachers wishing to evaluate their own selection of grammar tasks and coursebooks.


Received June 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.