Skip Navigation

ELT Journal 2005 59(2):126-134; doi:10.1093/eltj/cci026
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

ELT Journal Volume 59/2 April 2005 © Oxford University Press

Authentic language or language errors? Lessons from a learner corpus

Melinda Tan

Melinda Tan is Senior Lecturer in EFL at the University of Central Lancashire. Previously, she lectured on the MA in ELT and MA in ELL (English Language and Literatures) programmes at Assumption University, Bangkok. Her research interests lie in the areas of corpus linguistics, cognitive semantics, discourse analysis, and language teaching. Email: mtan{at}uclan.ac.uk

In the area of language teaching, a large number of learner corpora investigations have tended to rely on empirical data to identify common types of errors which illustrate inauthentic usages in a target language. One consequence of this kind of investigations is that such studies rarely, if ever, consider the inextricable link between language and culture, and the growing role of English as a lingua franca. Using examples of Thai English, this article calls for a re-examination of the common notion of ‘authentic’ language use. It suggests that much of learner English use is actually ‘authentic’ as a result of the cultural influences of the local context. A consideration of the practices and beliefs of the local culture could provide a better understanding of why learners use a foreign language in the way they do; a comprehension that cannot be gained from SLA theory and empirical data alone.


Revised March 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.