Skip Navigation

ELT Journal 2007 61(4):311-320; doi:10.1093/elt/ccm050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lynch, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press; all rights reserved.

Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task

Tony Lynch

Tony Lynch works at the Institute for Applied Language Studies, University of Edinburgh, where he teaches in-session and pre-sessional EAP courses and classroom-oriented courses in the MSc in Language Teaching. Among his books are Communication in the Language Classroom, Oxford University Press (1996) and a new edition of Study Listening, Cambridge University Press (2004). His recent research has focused on L2 task recycling, language learner identity and EAP classroom interaction

Email: A.J.Lynch{at}ed.ac.uk


   Abstract

This article reports a study of two English for Academic Purposes (EAP) classes who used different forms of transcript of their performances on a role-play speaking task as the basis for reprocessing and improving their output. One class used transcripts produced by the learners themselves, and the other used extracts transcribed by the teacher. Analysis of two subsequent performances on the same task—the second after two days and the third four weeks later—showed that both procedures were manageable under normal classroom conditions, and suggests that the self-transcribing procedure was more effective in helping the learners to maintain higher rates of accuracy in the forms highlighted during the reprocessing activities.


Final revised version received July 2005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.