Skip Navigation


ELT Journal Advance Access originally published online on July 21, 2006
ELT Journal 2008 62(2):157-163; doi:10.1093/elt/ccl021
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/2/157    most recent
ccl021v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lu, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press; all rights reserved.

A step forward: investigating expertise in materials evaluation

Keith Johnson, Mija Kim, Liu Ya-Fang, Andrea Nava, Dawn Perkins, Anne Margaret Smith, Oscar Soler-Canela and Wang Lu

The Language Teaching Expertise research group based within the Department of Linguistics and English Language at Lancaster University conducts original research every year into aspects of teaching expertise. The personnel of this group, made up of students and staff, changes yearly. Further details about this group can be found at http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/groups/latex/latex.htm

Received for publication 1 March 2006.
  Abstract

This article reports on a study investigating the textbook evaluation techniques of novice and experienced teachers, which was conducted by the Language Teaching Expertise Research Group (or LATEX) within Lancaster University's Department of Linguistics and English Language. Three ELT teachers were chosen to evaluate the student and teacher editions of a newly-released ELT textbook using the technique of concurrent verbalization. The results of the research add to the growing body of knowledge on expertise, providing insight into the differences between the teachers with respect to their various evaluation strategies. They also point to implications for the development of teacher education and training.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.