Skip Navigation



ELT Journal Advance Access published online on March 5, 2008

ELT Journal, doi:10.1093/elt/ccn015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newbold, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press; all rights reserved.

Co-certification: a new direction for external assessment?

David Newbold

David Newbold is a researcher in English language at the University of Venice (Ca' Foscari). He has taught in France, Italy, Spain, and the UK, and has published a wide range of ELT materials. He has a special interest in testing and assessment

Email: newbold{at}unive.it


   Abstract

The major European testing agencies have calibrated their exams to the levels of language proficiency described in the Common European Framework (CEFR). In Italy, where the Framework has been enthusiastically embraced, external exams are now frequently used within the state education system as they are believed to provide reliable, widely recognized, independent assessment. But although these exams vary greatly, it is not always easy to find one which is entirely appropriate for a specific learning context.

This article describes an experiment in ‘co-certification’, in which the University of Venice worked with Trinity College London to make an existing exam more appropriate for university students. This involved replacing ‘creative writing’ with ‘critical writing’ in the portfolio and the controlled written exam, and ensuring a ‘university dimension’ for the oral interview. The article reports on the modifications, and reflects on the project as an agent for change in teaching programmes. It concludes that there may be other contexts in which co-certification is both possible and desirable.


Final revised version received September 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.