Skip Navigation



ELT Journal Advance Access published online on May 20, 2008

ELT Journal, doi:10.1093/elt/ccn024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prapaisit de Segovia, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hardison, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press; all rights reserved.

Implementing education reform: EFL teachers' perspectives

Lakhana Prapaisit de Segovia and Debra M. Hardison

Lakhana Prapaisit de Segovia was affiliated with Prince of Songkla University, Thailand, before becoming Director of the Language Centre at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru. She is involved with teacher education and development of curricula and materials
Debra Hardison teaches courses in second language acquisition, research methods, and language teaching at Michigan State University. She has published in the area of spoken language processing and production and technology in oral skills development

Email: hardiso2{at}msu.edu

Received for publication 1 December 2007.
   Abstract

The National Education Act of 1999 in Thailand mandated a transition from teacher- to learner-centred instruction for all subjects including English. This shift was associated with the development of communicative ability in English to meet the needs of globalization. The current study investigated the policy behind and implementation of the reform in English teaching following Johnson's (1989) decision-making framework for a coherent curriculum. Several observations of English classes (grades 5–6) revealed no evidence of communicative language use. Stimulated recall and interviews with teachers revealed confusion about the reform's principles and their application. Teachers were concerned about their English proficiency, insufficient training, and inadequate resources and professional support. Of the four interviewed supervisors, one felt that the reform's principles were not suitable for teaching English. Findings point to areas of the curriculum in which coherence can be lost during reform.


Final revised version received December 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.