Skip Navigation

ELT Journal 1992 46(2):160-171; doi:10.1093/elt/46.2.160
© 1992 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fortune, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Self study grammar practice: learners' views and preferences

Alan Fortune

Alan Fortune is a Senior Lecturer in English Language Teaching at the Polytechnic of West London at Ealing. He holds an MSc in Applied Linguistics from Edinburgh University, and has worked in Sweden and Indonesia. His current work includes both the pre- and in-service training of English language teachers on the Polytechnic's 'MA in English Language Teaching' and other courses for British and overseas teachers. He also works extensively with undergraduate learners. His current research concerns individual learner differences in approaches to grammar learning. His other interests include cultural studies, syllabus design, and teaching and assessing advanced learners.

This is a report of a piece of action research which sought students' views on different types of self-study grammar practice exercises. Firstly, a set of defining characteristics of grammar exercises were identified and a battery containing a range of such exercises compiled. The exercises exhibited different clusters of characteristics, and were of both a deductive and inductive nature. Learners attempted the battery and then evaluated the different exercises. Their views were elicited by questionnaire and group interview. The experience of doing the exercises caused a significant number of learners to change their opinions about inductive and deductive practice. The investigation also tried to discover which exercise characteristics the learners found motivating and demotivating, thus providing potentially useful information for teachers and materials writers. Possibly fruitful areas for further investigation were identified.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.