Skip Navigation

ELT Journal 1992 46(4):340-349; doi:10.1093/elt/46.4.340
© 1992 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Medgyes, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

Native or non-native: who's worth more?

Péter Medgyes

Péter Medgyes holds a PhD in applied linguistics and language pedagogy. At present, he is Director of the Centre for English Teacher Training at Eötvös Lor{acute}nd University, Budapest. Previously, he was a teacher trainer at a comprehensive school for fifteen years. He has written several ELT textbooks and articles, which have appeared both in his home country and abroad. Dr Medgyes is the outgoing President of IATEFL Hungary. His current research interest is focused on the native/non-native issue

Among the trends which have recently emerged in ELT, two are challenged in this article. One trend suggests that researchers' attention should be focused on the learner rather than on the teacher. However, the implicit message of this article is that the road to the learner leads through the teacher and that teacher-related research should therefore be increased. The other trend attempts to get rid of the native speaker versus non-native speaker division, offering various alternative terms and concepts to replace it. I argue, however, that a non-native cannot aspire to acquire a native speaker's language competence. I also argue that, in ELT, native-and non-native-speaking teachers reveal considerable differences in their teaching behaviour and that most of the discrepancies are language-related. It does not follow from this, however, that non-native-speaking teachers are by definition less efficient. Indeed, I would contend that a deficient command of English may even have hidden advantages. The explicit message of this article is that natives and non-natives have an equal chance to become successful teachers, but the routes used by the two groups are not the same.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RELC JournalHome page
C. Y. Ling and G. Braine
The Attitudes of University Students towards Non-native Speakers English Teachers in Hong Kong
RELC Journal, December 1, 2007; 38(3): 257 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ELT JHome page
D. Carless
Collaborative EFL teaching in primary schools
ELT J, October 1, 2006; 60(4): 328 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.